Evaluation Criteria

We take the grant review process very seriously.  Each complete proposal that fits our priorities and meets our minimum requirements is carefully read, researched and evaluated against the following criteria.  Proposals fully meeting the criteria are compared to each other in order to determine how best to invest our limited resources. We can not fund all of the excellent proposals that fully meet our evaluation criteria.

Successful applicants will demonstrate: 

  1. Fit with one or more of the Carolyn Foundation funding priorities.

For funding related to economically disadvantaged children and youth applicants must demonstrate:

What percentage of program participants are:

  • Children and youth ages 0-18.
  • Economically disadvantaged, eligibility for free or reduced lunch.
  • Live in the city of New Haven, excluding suburbs and neighboring communities.

Demonstrate best practice program design/implementation to achieve age appropriate articulated outcomes.

For funding related to community vitality applicants must demonstrate the connection between their program and vitality of the broader community.

For funding related to community vitality applicants must demonstrate the connection between their program and the vitality of the community in New Haven.

Who participates/attends in your program(s) and how do they reflect the diversity of New Haven

  • Age, race, gender, ethnic background
  • Socio-economic background
  • Minneapolis residents
  • Diverse interests and experiences

How do your programs enhance vitality and quality of life in New Haven.  For example do they

  • bring together diverse communities.
  • make community resources more accessible and inviting to diverse audiences.
  • spotlight and share the arts, culture and heritage of community residents.
  • support and empower active community engagement.
  • other
  1. A compelling local community need and a credible plan to meet that need. Clearly explain the need/issue that you are addressing and provide best practice models &/or logic models that demonstrate why and how the chosen approach will work.
  2. Qualified staff & organization leadership, provide information regard staff skills, experiences and prior success and provide a list of the applicant’s Board of Trustees.
  3. Systemic alignment within the community. Explain the relation to and distinction from other similar and/or cooperating agencies.
  4. Sound fiscal policies, management & financial health.  Provide required financial information and past and anticipated sources of financial support.
  5. Solid outcomes and evaluation processes. Provide clear outcome measures and a detailed plan for evaluation of the results of the proposed project including performance measures.